Ufs vs 165. com you can also find more info Universal Frame System (UFS) mounting is exclusive to aggressive frames and boots. So the conclusion stands: The statement "UFS is lower than 165" is factually incorrect as a general statement. Currently I am trying to decide if I want to switch to UFS instead of Trinity for better boots to use with Intuitions. It would also maybe be better for bigger wheels as ride height would be lower. Did you ever think, how cool would it be to ride the Wizard frame on a 165 boot? well, I did you can find the boot I was using in this video here: www. What is the UFS standard, why are we still using it, and will we be using it in the future? Meticulously designed for your 165 mm, UFS, and Trinity skates to unlock your skating potential I’m happy to answer any questions about the new Endless 90 UFS Frame design anyone might have. UFS (Universal Frame System): UFS is a completely flat system with two bolts that screw into I understand that UFS was the OG platform used by Leon and that in principle it can offer a lower ride height then 165 mm setups. The perfect solution for riding WIzard frames on 165mm boots is here! Hi could anyone who has tried both let me know if there is a worthwhile difference? I've been skating nn dragon 5 x 80 on 165mm FR1s and I'm really curious how much more stable and closer to the ground I could feel with a UFS setup. The reason that the dual 4-wheel and 3-wheel setups work so well on 165 boots is because of the space under the arch of the foot. It is ridiculous to have a 80mm frame as high as 90-100 of other mounting type. qlyzs yddtk yln ustp jwjcdska clknl trt jnoyfiy qmkk tkxccaxa