34 vs 49 ultrawide reddit. Members Online • The_Mr_Sir .

34 vs 49 ultrawide reddit The additional real-estate improves the immersion. Or check it out in the app stores Also what are the positive and negative of 1440p 34 unch ultrawide vs 1440p 27 inch? Ty so much guys <3 love and peace 🤙🤙 Share I run a super ultrawide 49” with 2080ti and 3900x and can play almost all old and recent titles on ultra Why not keep the 34 and vertically stack it with the 49. All resolutions, from 21:9 to 32:9, are celebrated here. Imo the only way you could possibly claim you can’t tell the difference between a 4K 27in 16:9 panel and a 34in 21:9 1440p ultrawide panel is if you have never actually used a 4K panel. What do you prefer for programming and why? Archived post. I think 34" ultawide's additional width might cause some neck problem. Triple 34" Welcome to r/ultrawidemasterrace, the hub for Ultrawide enthusiasts. 49" Ultrawide has the advantage that all titles support it unlike triples and I enjoy WRC 10 atm that doesn't or BeamNG occasionally. Will never get triples after having the 49". The secondary monitor would be a 24" vertical monitor. Moreover dual-monitor setup is easier in terms of window management: you can easily move windows between monitors and 38 definitely, ultrawide is already wide enough in my opinion, and 38" is the perfect size for this resolution. There's YouTube videos comparing the 38inch Alienware and the 34 inch Alienware side by side. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets 34 is ultrawide 3440x1440 vs 32 that is 2650x1440. I used to use 2 27 inch monitors. Now it also depends on your hardware if you have enough power to display more than 60hz on an ultrawide monitor. Right now I have a standard 27" 1440p 144hz monitor that I have on a gas strut to move my monitor closer to me when I set up my playseat challenge at my desk. I went from a 34" 1440 ultrawide to the PG42. 0" 3440x1440] and one no-name 1080p 22" monitor. And even then double curved 49"s @4k beats it out or your trip 32s if they're 4k beat it out. I am between getting a 32" 4K or a 34" Curved Ultrawide. Join us for game discussions, tips and tricks, and all things OSRS! OSRS is the official legacy version of RuneScape, the largest free-to-play MMORPG Gaming monitor usually 144hz or more. The curved monitor is more immersive and it's more natural looking at things on the sides of the panel. I don't know if the cost to upgrade from the 34" to the 38" was worth it, since the price difference is almost double (when selling the old monitor to purchase the new) but productivity is not doubled. I use it for coding, writing, and research. So the real goal is two IMO 49>38>34 but I'm more of a strategy gamer so it different (I did try all). However for 49 inch there is only G9 and Neo G9 is usable due to the curve, others are all too flat. Software developers? 2x4k vs 49" screen Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I first went with Samsung's CRG9 "MegaWide" or "Super UltraWide" (49" 5120x1440 VA, 120 Hz FreeSync). Obviously: screen size. All that being said, I’d take a 34” curved 3440x1440 over a 4k for programming. Henlo! I have a 34 inch 3440x1440 screen (ultrawide boi), and IMm thinking of getting two screens to complete my setup. After doing my research and looking at some models irl I figured 49" is too wide and 34" too small. 1440p 34-inch ultrawide VS Welcome to r/ultrawidemasterrace, the hub for Ultrawide enthusiasts. Any suggestions one way or the other? I sit about 28 inches from the screen if that makes a difference. The 49 picked a lot more reflections than my 34, which made the monitor unusable and due to the 1000R aggressive curve it was too close to me and required a lot of desk space although I used a monitor arm to minimize it. As what was mentioned here, VR is a matter of time. things you dont watch too often but you can keep while having something else full screen on the ultrawide) On View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Budget option would be just getting a 4K 27” to use with my 1080p 27” on the left and MBP in a stand on the right. I want the in-car displays to be to scale, 1:1, or as close as possible while taking into account a simulated depth. I can fit a 49” inch monitor there. Some love it some dont. However, the step from my 34" Samsung VA to the Neo is much smaller than the Neo G9 to the DWF in terms of picture quality. Took a couple of weeks to get used to Option 1 has more choices available within your budget. I also have a 49” ultrawide and it’s just about perfect. So after a very difficult start of the year I’m going to get myself a present, and I’m completely torn between the new Aw3821dw and the odyssey G9, price is very similar and can’t make a decision. I got the neo G9 for one reason : Sim racing. I’m drawn to the 49 inch ultrawide single monitor, but is triples still the way to go? I only want the opinions of people who had triples and used a 49 inch ultrawide for correct and experienced comparison. I'll probably end up sticking with 21:9 and going with a VR head set for full emersion. But now I'm unsure if a 38" LG is the right choice or if its worth spending ~500-600€ more for a 5k2k 40"(probably LG) as I will use it many hours each day. Other reason is height. 49" super ultra wide is equivalent to 34" UW and in my opinion is too small vertically for both cases. For work and prefer the 34" UltraWide, I can fit two windows nicely, originally I though with a 4K screen I will devide the screen in 4 corners but in practice I ended up not doing that and would split them on the left and right side which while the TV was bigger it 49" ultrawide is the way to go. The 34" 1440P has better DPI (110 vs 105) but both should be good enough. Super cool, I had been considering doing something similar to this. Would never switch back to any other multi-monitor setup. if you do run across one, it isn't an issue to just play in either a 21:9 resolution or 16:9 I've only tried 49" super ultrawide 32:9 and triple 32" 2560x1440. 5-2 times the cost of getting 2 good 27 inch ultrawide monitors. However, after using dual monitors, I finally retired both of them and purchased a 34" Ultrawide which I am currently happily enjoying. In the end it's a great monitor, just need to figure it out. Currently I’ve got two 27 inch curved monitors. Join us for a wider point Welcome to r/ultrawidemasterrace, the hub for Ultrawide enthusiasts. A 34” monitor is 3440x1440 pixels which is about 5 million pixels. I have a 27" stacked above my 49" 32:9. However, 32 pixel density is streched out compared to 27. I want to one day get a decent Sim Rig and i feel like the 49" curve 1000r will do the work. On the contrary, I think 34"+27" (or 49"+24") would generally be better for productivity use than a 49". Had I more space, triple 34" curved monitors would be ideal for giving a wrap around immersion . I would say if you are mostly FPS gamer I would go for 34" - I know I would prefere to have a bit smaller screen to grasp more of an action at once and having 15-20% FPS more is also great. Honestly, I hate having anything up that high. Welcome to /r/SkyrimMods! We are Reddit's primary hub for all things modding, from troubleshooting for beginners to creation of mods by experts. When I checked out all the monitors @ micro center. She was not into the idea of an ultrawide at first, but fast forwards to today and we both have dual 34" ultrawide setups. Another 38 vs 49” post . Come and join us today! Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I am considering either going with a single 49 to 57 inch monitor or getting a 34 to 38 inch monitor with the 2 27 inch monitors being oriented vertically on either side of the Ultra Wide monitor. 34" ultrawide and keeping one of your current displays would get you more desktop space and is perhaps more practical if you like doing things like running Discord or web sites or whatever on a second monitor while you game. Having an ultrawide is more about immersion for gaming. I just love the feeling you get from only having one monitor infront of you. So i guess the point of my post is to maybe consider the type of car you’re racing. 49" is as tall as 27" and 34", which is too narrow for my taste. My current monitor is the [LG 34UM88C-P 34. Hello all, Just wanted to share that playing with an ultrawide is so different. I went from a 34 to 49 and realized that was too much for me and immediately send it back. Essentially I have these 49 inch high refresh rate options in my country: Samsung G9 Odyssey for 1400€ Samsung LC49RG90SSUXEN for 1229€ I had the 34 inch ultrawide for a month but returned it. I'm thinking of getting LG's 49" monitor but unsure if there are any other, better options, or if a 38" will meet my needs TL;DR Tech worker looking at getting either a 49" or 38" Ultrawide I don't have enough GPU power to drive 49 inch, and Still prefer 16:9 ratio for Halo Infinite multiplayer (planned to use 34 inch ultrawide for campaign though), not to mention easier to drive. The amount of people on this sub going “you can’t even tell the difference in resolution !!!! “ is absurd. However, triple ultrawides is a bit overkill, and comes at a higher price than, say, 27 inch 2560x1440 screens. You gave to physically rotate your head look look from end to end. Understanding these factors will help you decide which monitor To be fair, the 34” really does look small compared to the much wider 49” beside it. I’d love the Dell 49” but it’s a stretch at the moment. I wish it had a tighter curve (I think it’s 1800r). Thinking about moving from a 34" to a 49" but not sure if it'll suit the space. The home of the simracing community on Reddit. But I'd be lying if i said i didn't miss the peripheral immersion achieved with an ultrawide. So I was thinking of mounting it on top of a 34" uw monitor and using that for shooters and the G9 for everything else. upvotes 49" is a no personnaly as the height is too low and too much lenght but some people like it 57" (g9) as the same issue as the 49 for the lenght but the height looks good and if you have money and space you can use it as a 21:9 5120x2160 with high refresh rate Welcome to the 45" 5120x2160 144hz waiting room Samsung 34'' Monitor Odyssey OLED G85SB or 49" Odyssey Neo G9 DQHD Quantum Mini-LED Gaming Monitor (please help or recommend something else) Hi so I'm stuck between the choice of these two monitors, mainly will be for productivity, my desk is 1. If it were 27" 1440p vs 34" 1440p, if you can drive the extra pixels on the Ultrawide it's totally worth it in my opinion but remember you are going to get biased results asking a question like this in an Ultrawide subreddit. If I have 100% scaling on Ultrawide. Coming from a 27 inch 16:9, is it better to go for a 34 inch ultrawide or 49 inch super ultra? The biggest difference between ultrawide and the super ultrawide for me is in productivity. There is I am a software developer looking for a new monitor for my work set up. The 34 inch ultrawide is curved (1000r), 165hz, and VA. It’s pretty cool but if prob be fine with 1 32” 4K instead and laptop as second display. A 34” monitor is just a wide 27” monitor (it’s 33% wider with 33% more pixels in width so you get 33% more on screen horizontally). It may be that 34” vs triples is the question? I have the 49" and its amazing. It's honestly not that much ich bigger. between the options 34 or 49 inches 34 inch -> basically 27 inch plus some space on the sides 38 inch -> basically 32 inch plus some space on the sides 49 inch -> basically two 27 inch next to each other. I would take a look at those to see the difference in size. Or check it out in the app stores A 49 inch 32:9 ultrawide is the same as 2 27 inch monitors. It works great, especially with it's built-in KVM capabilities, but it's only a 60hz panel and admittedly leaves me wanting for a bit more screen real-estate since it's effectively two 4:3 panels smashed together. When I upgraded to 34" 1440p ultrawide, I thought that it was as good as it gets. comments Just received and setup my Odyssey G9 57” below my 49” Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I thought the resolution/pixel density was a sweet spot for gaming (I have a 5800x3D/4090). I'm not sure if I'm willing to pay 3 times more if I can get 90 % of the experience for much less. The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, TechQuickie and other LinusMediaGroup content. If you were to get a 32:9 Super Ultrawide, that would be enough, depending on how close you can get it to you, to see your mirrors in most open-wheel cars. I was in the same boat deciding to go 34" or 38". Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; &nbsp; TOPICS. Both very fast so the difference between the two is hardly noticable, if at all and because people's reaction times are like, 200ms, that 2ms doesn't really make a difference. The 34 inch ultrawide is a beautiful display and is very immersive for gaming. If you code a lot (scripts, IaC, whatever) I'd go with ultrawide. my laptop has the 4900 amd cpu with a 2060 max and hooked up to my 1440p 165 hz 34in monitor by usb-c and I feel no lag whatsoever. - I use my current 21:9 monitor in home office for programming and the second for a terminal/outlook - After work I use the 21:9 for casual gaming (fifa career mode, cyberpunk, city skylines ) and the second for discord/teamspeak/youtube View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Also, my 34" UW monitor is 144hz and my supplemental monitor 32" 16:9 is 144Hz as well, so I don't really feel the need to upgrade, until HDR is at a point, where it provides a seamless experience. Now that I'm at 38" 1600p ultrawide, I'm 99% sure this is the current gold standard. 1440p ultrawide 34-inch VS 4K 32-inch . The 34" is like having 2 1/2" monitors and the 49" is like having 3 full monitors. 1440p would be ideal for the XSX but the ultrawide is a moot point for console (though, in theory, I’m am ok with pillarboxing). When I had dual ultrawide monitors for half a year, there was so much screen space that it was hilariously to look it. I guess a 38” ultrawide could be the middle ground but I’m concerned Even if you go with a triple 24” set up, you still get a better FOV than with a 49” ultrawide. The hFOV can be extended by using TrackIR and I set it up for +180° hFOV when pointing my head The 38" is closer to that 16:10 experience with ultrawide resolution while 34" is closer to 16:9 ratio with ultrawide resolution. Not really looking to buy two separate smaller monitors to make it a dual monitor setup. It's an incredible LCD monitor, and supersedes my previous 34" Samsung VA panel. Dive into discussions about game support, productivity, or share your new Ultrawide setup. Buying a monitor for Work 32" 4k vs 34" ultrawide Thoughts on dual ultrawide (2 x 34" 42:9) vs 49" 32:9 . Not useful for gaming but the screen real estate for work is amazing. I find games like Divinity Original Sin 2 better on the 16:9. Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. I'm now purchasing the 32 inch 4K model. I use AOC49inch ultrawide screen. Not sure if it's available in your region but it's worth a look. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; then a Samsung 34" 21:9 ultrawide above that, and a Samsung M7 mounted portrait style to the right of it all. See our recommendations for the best ultrawide monitors, the best ultrawide gaming monitors, and if you Choosing between a 34-inch monitor and a 49-inch monitor can impact your ergonomics and user comfort. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; &nbsp; TOPICS 49" vs 38" vs 34" for Coding/ Work . 32 inch 4k is higher compared to 34 inch ultrawide. The choices are 34” + 27” vs 49”. Looking for monitor arms / setup help. I'd say if you can afford the somewhat crazy price difference between the 34" and the 38", get the 38" as you probably won't upgrade for the next foreseeable future. Should I see similar Space with a slightly sharper look? The other option was the 5k2k 34" I am confused if I should have just 1 49 inch monitor or dual 34 inch monitors one on top of another. A Reddit community for those who work from home! Helpful tips and discussions on productivity, the lifestyle, and making it all work! 34” ultrawide monitor vs 49” ultra-ultrawide? Question Hey all, Shopping for a new monitor since the new Macbooks only support 1 external monitor (I’ve been using 2 for a while, plugged in directly into Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Build Help 34 inches is also an option, but I prefer 32 inch monitors to 27 inch monitors for their immersion. It’s for productivity and gaming. I went the 38 route with a side 24 1080p to get some more vertical space on the I've had a 49" CRG9 5120x1440 for about two years now and I'm about to go back down to 34" 3440x1440 when the new Alienware QD-OLED comes out. a. I have the 2 x 27” and a 34” curved ultrawide and was able to get it configured in iRacing with little trouble. If you have the space and the mounting options, this is most definitely the way to go. I upgraded from a 34" alienware uw to the 49" samsung g9. Darker overall scenes smeared a lot less than past VAs I've seen, but it still looked bad compared my (by now very old) 34" IPS. gaming is super immersive and there are very little games these days that don't offer ultrawide support. Triples are night and day better as long as the game has good compatibility for triples. YMMV but I switched to a 40" 5k2k (dell U4021QW) nstead thats more like 21:10 than 21:9 and the extra height and width is where I think the sweet spot is. Or check it out in the app stores 34 ultrawide vs 32 4k 144hz Discussion to a 34" LG gn850, and now I'm on a 49" Odyssey G9. I like the idea of the super ultra-wides (43" or 49"), but I'm wondering if I'll be missing out on the extra screen height with the 38" (15. I've been thinking about picking up a 34" ultrawide as I'll definitely be able to run it without buying a new GPU and it will be much easier and cheaper to mount. That's also pending you are utilizing the correct FOV for your setup. However, compared to the 49", the 38" is a hands down better productivity monitor. But it is a lot of extra pixels to drive. 32", 32", 42" and 49" displays with all possible resolutions Software dev here, I tried using a 49" ultrawide (CRG9) for my day job and found it a little too wide for me. Terms & Policies the 34 or 49 g8/g9 oled may have full 10 bit at 175hz as well as better calibrated hdr profile, but last time I checked most of the time people are using sdr content which the dwf is king of and you can use cru as well as custom refresh rate For the height argument 21:9 vs 16:9 has the same 9 so the a 34 1440p ultrawide has the same height as a 27 1440p (I wouldn't buy a 32" 1440p the dpi is too high and I hate using windows scaling) And for 2160p vs 1440p it all depends on size and viewing distance, 4k is stupidly intensive on the gpu and for 4k to has good dpi without scaling 42 The G9 is a great great compromise between FOV immersion and physical space. Especially for VA panel, the view angle is too bad, the curve help a lot. 34+2x24" to a 49" here. 57-inch Samsung Odyssey G9: I doubt 49 vs 57 would make the difference in this particular issue, so more a general ergonomic warning. I could've bought a 34" UW or a 43" TV and would have been fine, but I like the ultrawide. Its simply amazing and I will only ever upgrade it for another ultrawide monitor. 38" or 40" 21:9 really feels like the sweet spot for me with the additional vertical space. I'm back to my old 27" 1440p as I debate It turns out I can fit the 34, but with the increase in size, I'm not sure if I should stick with a flat or get a curved monitor. Acer Predator X34P 34" (3440x1440, G-Sync) c. I find FPS game more enjoyable on the 21:9. Considering the upgrade to a 49" UW and I am concerned about "downgrading" resolution. What you recommend? I'd say he Neo G9 has about 60% of the picture quality of the DWF. And with 240 hz, the games really jump out of the screen. Which 38 inch cannot offer. I switch between 2 OS via HDMI and having 2 separate 34 inch monitors would be good for my setup. I dont think any amount of bezel would be ok, so I'm looking at the samsung ultrawide to To be honest I have a 38 inch ultrawide and I already want a second monitor to go above the screen to watch shit on YouTube while I'm playing a game. 34” ultrawide vs. For older games that don't let you configure the screens correctly, it's about on par with a 49". I would honestly just take a look at a picture between the two side by side. Samsung 49" curved ultrawide (3840x1080, FreeSync 2) b. If I go with the 4k monitor, I’m afraid that I will not be noticing the Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. GPU For 49 inch Ultrawide (5120x1440) upvote Need help choosing between the 34 A 21:9 Ultrawide monitor would be a huge downgrade from a triple 16:9 monitor setup. Excellent for everything. ~13 "). It is 1440 and 144Hz refresh and priced pretty fairly. Two 34 inch ultrawide dual monitors vs One 49 inch ultrawide monitor Peripherals I have been using a triple monitor setup, two 21 inches external monitor and a 15 inch laptop in the middle, for last 8 years. plus I like having portrait orientation on my 27 inch. 😀 I personally have a 34' 1080p lg ultrawide and use it for gaming and programming and tbh yeah you do notice the pixels a bit but you do get used to it over time but it all amounts to your tolerance , it's great for games and movies and you can never see a pixel on those, but when it comes to reading documents or writing lines of code it does the job but you will wish for a The increase in PPI is going to make a huge difference in text legibility and the increase in screen real estate (pixels) is more than double (the 49” G9 has slightly fewer pixels than a single 4k screen, and the 57” is exactly two 4k 32”screens). This would be mainly for music production, where seeing a few extra tracks in arrangement view would be nice. Recommendations I have a Xiaomi Mi 34" ultrawide but I'm seeking to ascend to the next level. Reply reply Depends on what you use it for. Both monitors are great for their respective prices. The vibrance and color and utter lack of any ghosting whatsoever is absolutely mind blowing. My primary use is cramming lots of windows with info on the display. Current setup is a Macbook Pro for work/personal stuff and a gaming PC, both connected via KVM to the 34". And while I love the g9 for most games, it is just overkill for first-person shooters. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. I see all the super ultrawide posts and just think that it's a little too much, but then again I haven't tried it for myself. I always wondered which is better looking games playing on ultrawide vs 32 inch? Is 32 inch too big playing on desk? I upgraded from a 34 ultra wide 1440p to 32 4 k, both are oled, and the 4k is just that much sharper. New LG Ultragear 45" OLED next to my 7 year old Asus 34" Ultrawide. My 32 inch will go above whichever ultra wide I get. The community for Old School RuneScape discussion on Reddit. So I’m a biochem graduate and upgraded from a 27 inch to a 34 inch and it’s a night and day difference in terms of productivity. SAMSUNG 49" Odyssey OLED G9 G95SC vs 49" G93SC vs 34" G8 G85SB ultrawide gaming monitors overview and thoughts . So that 34 is exactly the same pixel density as 27. I'm torn between the 34 and the 40 LG offers with that res, the 34 is I have both a 34" flat ultrawide and a 34" curved ultrawide. So I did a thing today. For productivity though it's also amazing. You can choose between monitors with IPS or VA panels and go with a 27-inch or 32-inch sized monitor. What Is A 34-inch Monitor Equivalent To? Choosing between a 34-inch and 49-inch monitor depends Personally, I prefer the ultrawide as my main screen for working on documents, but if you're doing creativity work, the larger desktop real estate and higher ppi of 32" 4K would probably work better. I couldn't take it cos while it was immersive, I couldn't wear if for more than 30mins. Or check it out in the app stores the hub for Ultrawide enthusiasts. A 49-inch ultrawide monitor is equivalent to two 27-inch monitors side by side, offering a seamless, expansive view. Best A Reddit community for those who work from home! Helpful tips and discussions on productivity, the lifestyle, and making it all work! This is not a job board. The only not-perfect part is that it is a VA screen instead of IPS but the calibration is great so not really an issue. I couldn't decide between flat vs curved on a 34" ultrawide monitor so I tried one of each. Told myself 34" is the sweet spot, 38" just too big. I work on coding and docs and sometime games. But in my opinion the biggest benefit of 38“ is the extra vertical screen space compared to a 34“ or 49“ monitor. I prefer it over the current state of VR (steam index) for sim racing 49 inch 1440p Ultra-wide gives a lot of space, very easy to put 3 decent sized Window. They have both side by side on display. I can get a pretty long arm for it, so I might be able to get it as close as 50cm from my face, though 60-70 is more of a guarantee. There the 38" makes more sense. Im not sure though that 49” will allow me to see out right side window. I'm currently running triple 4k 34"s, cost me about $1. 38” ultrawide Recommendations Archived post. Just edit an ini file and set the in-game monitor settings and I'm constantly torn between them. If you want an ultrawide set up, I would save up a bit more and Needing advice. Especially at a normal sitting distance. The screen would Welcome to r/ultrawidemasterrace, the hub for Ultrawide enthusiasts. I’m ready to ascend, but a bit conflicted. Or check it out in the app stores 32” 4K vs. I personally think 32" 1440p has too low of a PPI (this does boil down to preference). Last of Us, Ratchet and Clank, God of War, Horizon, Halo Infinite, and even the Quake remasters look absolutely STUNNING on this thing. At that FOV scale I'm not sure the difference would be as drastic between the two monitors in the video. A 34" Widescreen seems to be a super good deal with pretty OK stuff around 400 euro, but these 49" monitors seem so nice in terms of FOV, but at a MUCH steeper price of 900 euro. I usually have 3 VS Code opened for Terraform for multiple clients and switched from 24" +laptop to 49" ultrawide (Samsung with 1000R curvature). Debating on picking up the 49" ultrawide. Dual ultrawide monitors. I'm looking to buy the Dell 34" Curved Gaming Monitor (S3422DWG) ; it's on sale for $600 right now. The 4k is a 16:9, (3840 X 2160). Welcome to r/ultrawidemasterrace, the hub for Ultrawide enthusiasts. You can have your resources up on 2/3rds of the screen and your document in the middle. I personally don't think there's a noticeable difference in picture quality between 1440p and 2160p at 32" or smaller screen sizes. Also, should the 34" ultrawide be curved so that corners are visible better or is flat fine? Comments and experiences appreciated. Asus ROG SWIFT PG348Q (3440x1440, G-Sync) d. This way I could have both monitors in full view to limit the amout of movement. 5440x1440 is great. When I upgraded to 27" 1440p, I was blown away. I'd say depends on the type of work you do. Alienware / Dell AW3418DW (3440x1440, G-Sync) Can someone tell me about his experience making the step from dual setup to one ultrawide for gaming and multitasking? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I work in tech as a security engineer, not a gamer at all. from 21:9 to 32:9, are celebrated here. My desk space is somewhat limited. Ultrawide for anything other than digital content productivity. With Option 2 there are a very few ultrawide monitors that will fit your budget. When I went from a 34" to a 44+" setup was because the 34 felt too restrictive as a replacement for a multi-display setup (came from a Dual 24" setup originally) The 34 did solo duties really well but if you wanted some sort of multi-tasking it felt like you were making huge accommodations to squeeze things into the format like trying to sit 7 adults in a small SUV that seats "7" but the The desk fits it all just fine, but the sound seems quite different from when I had them beside a non-ultrawide. I think ill need triples for that. I would argue 60 vs 100hz or more is a significant upgrade and worth it. Your 2x27" setup is pretty much equivalent to a single 49" 5120x1440 screen, just with bezels. Honestly, I just wanted the biggest ultrawide I could find. I had the chance to move from a 32" 4k to a 34" 1440 then to a 49" ultrawide before landing on a triple. Full screen use: Video content is "usually" better on the monitor that matches it's aspect ratio, but 21:9 videos on a 32" monitor are close to the same size, as it is on the 34" monitor. For a 16:9 27" monitor I wouldn't pay much extra for a curved monitor (is a nice to have, but not as noticeable). e. Along the way had a pair of vive. It's definetly an upgrade - much nicer desk feel having a single big seamless monitor. The 1440p is a 21:9, (3440 X 1440). I'm considering trying them below, but we'll see. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Archived post. I’m building a computer and rig for a friend for iRacing who is an avid sim racer and deciding how to move the money. Or check it out in the app stores Between 1440p Ultrawide 34” VA 144hz or 27” 4k IPS 60hz . With such big screens you should have high depth desk to avoid sitting too close to hurt your neck. Complete newb to ultrawide, up until recently I was using a flat 24 inch so this is a new world to me. so it really depends on your use case. It all started when I let my wife borrow my single 34" ultrawide when working from home became the thing a couple years ago and monitors were impossible to come by. When friends are over and see my rig for the first time the monitor is the big draw, it's cool and it's a statement. Others are going to say it’s going to suffer from burn-in. » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Dell G2724D for mid range - IPS, 165hz, Reddit favorite monitors. Members Online • The_Mr_Sir . productivity is incredible since it's all there and seemless without the need to move windows to multiple monitors. Vs The 49” is stationary at a curvy 1000R (the 34” is 1800R) but it cannot surround you like the previous setup though it does have the benefit of no bezels. Depends entirely on the type of work you do, and how you manage windows, but for most types of work that don't require one large / super long workspace, I think 34"+27" (or 49"+24") is more versatile than a single 49". The price difference between a $ 500 (MSI MAG401QR) and a $ 1500 (top of the line) monitor is quite big. Contrast is ok. 34" ultrawide 1440p vs standard 27" 1440p monitor . But I am also lonving the idea of having a single giant 49 inch monitor. The extra width gives more real estate to put browser windows and such side by side. Hence with 32 inch 4k, you need to sit even more away compared to 34 inch ultrawide. The text clarity was totally fine for me - I didn't notice any fringing. The primary monitor would be a 34" curved ultrawide. 2x27 gives you more pixels (it's 3840x2160x2 in case of 4K monitors). Anyway, when the time came (black friday sale) and i just jumped on the alienware 38. Or check it out in the app stores so the 34 does seem more like a true ultrawide compared to the 38. If it was me and I would use a monitor every day for productivity and also gaming, I would probably go for either the Alienware 38” AW3821DW IPS nano color or roll the dice and hope you win display lottery with Samsung and get the Odyssey G9 Neo 49” mini-led. This is a confusing bunch of monitors so here is what I was able to gather as the main comparisons. 3k, aka under a fifth of what the lg monitor would cost and I've got more viewing space than it provides. If I choose a 29" Ultrawide monitor, more than likely I would get a flat screen vs a curved screen as I hear that curved ultrawide monitors are better for 34" or larger. Or check it out in the app stores 49” or maybe a 38” ultrawide for mostly programming. I'm currently rocking a Dell 34" 1440p ultrawide that I've had for 5ish years. Join us for a wider point of view. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I'm wondering what people think about the IPS display for that price, or if people thing VA displays is the way to go We've bought and tested over 335 monitors, and below, you'll find our picks for the best 34 to 49-inch monitors available. Also 34” between speakers kid if gets in the way View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Actually liked ROG's 35" the most. So my question is simple, are they actually worth being almost 2,5x the price? Or does the 34" only seem small against a 49", but is more then adequate in reality? The 49 inch TV is flat, 60hz, and would be probably between 70 and 100cm from my face, depending on what wall bracket I can get for it. I recently picked up this 34" ultrawide after racing on a single flat 24" for my first year or so. I use 34" UW myself and will go for 38-45" UW in the future. If I have 3090 money, I probably have money for 49 inch too, so who knows in the future! Depends on your desk size. 1440, 144Hz, 34", curved, ultrawide, g-sync. TVs Is getting dual 27 inch ultrawide monitors more productive and outweighs the benefits of getting a single 34 or 38 inch ultrawide display? Interested to know the pros and cons of both, your experiences using them as I am planning to upgrade my setup but the 34 inch ultrawide are very expensive almost 1. I play my FPS games at 21:9 essentially a 34" ultrawide monitor(for the high frames), and everything else at 49" 32:9 with the Odyssey (Rocket League With touring cars i feel like 34 is not wide enough. It's honestly much better than I would have ever thought. Most likely Title says 49". Each size offers unique benefits and challenges. The ultrawide does that too, but since the super ultrawide is essentially two 27" monitors side by side in terms of size, it just does that a little better. On my 4k 102ppi I am currently running 125% scaling. Members Online. 5" vs. I've gone from 27 to 34 to 49 so feel pretty well placed to Welcome to r/ultrawidemasterrace, the hub for Ultrawide enthusiasts. Some are going to sayjust use it. I'd grab a 32" 4K now, and then upgrade the 27" to a 34" ultrawide later! I was looking at the 34GN850 but that boy was either unavailable or around €1000. I see the extreme curve on the G9 as the next "cool" thing. My idea was to get a 49 inch ultrawide, put the 34 inch ultrawide above it and get rid of the 2 x 27 inch monitors. I mostly play stuff like Dark Souls, Sekiro, Elden Ring, Skyrim etc. A 38” monitor is 3840x1600 pixels which is about 6 million pixels so it shows about 20% more information on screen than a 34” monitor. Ascended from 34" 21:9 to 49" 32:9 OLED, very On the fence between 34 inch vs 39 inch Ultrawide monitors . And too wide for gaming. I ended up going for the Xiaomi Mi 34 ultrawide for €450 (on sale) and it's been great. Currently using a decade old budget 1080p TV so I can't imagine going for an Hard disagree from me. It enables me to see more lines of code for work at the same time or Agreed. So for my preferred settings I'm not sure I'd get much more with a 49" compared to my 48" LG C1. I have a 165hz ultrawide and it's awesome for other games so to me, it's definitely I'm torn between two options: 49-inch ultrawide: Seems like a good balance of size and productivity. 34” ultrawide monitor vs 49” ultra-ultrawide? I have 2 34" ultrawides at my personal workstation. Aside from that: separate my windows already with multiple monitors. Ensure you have the right software to take advantage of it In general, the 34/38 size monitors have a bit more compatibility for a larger variety of games than the 49in. It's still a VA panel. I had a 34" prior to getting this one and upgraded to the 49". Finally got my older Alienware 34” mounted above my Samsung 49”, turned out great. Brothers, I am struggling and can’t decide whether to go with the ultrawide or the 4k. Before you think about future proof think about practicality. Ac and acc for example do. At the end its personal preference. Currently using 3x27" 60hz triples with very thin bezels(1/4" on each side), it does OK but still noticeable bezels, and immersion breaking to me. I would also get an arm for it. Dual 34 asking a biased reddit page isn't going to get you the right answer. For an ultrawide I wouldn't buy one that wasn't curved at this point. I have the notorious LG 34" Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 that many people love to hate on, but man, every game looks and plays like a wet dream. I have a 34" UWQHD display and I absolutely love the more immersive experience of an ultrawide. I am extremely torn between the Gigabyte M32UC 32” 4k vs a Dell 3422DWG 34” Ultra-wide for use with a Gigabyte 3080 12GB Master. I am a casual gamer and play a mix of FPS, RPG and AAA single player games. The 49" is incredible for immersion Not many new curved 34" IPS-displays for sale where I live. I used the curved first and you're right about not noticing the curve after 5 minutes, it's not because it's a cheap party trick bu because it makes it to seamless. 8m in length so I have the space, I will be using this with a mac and potentially some PC gaming. Ascended from 34" 21:9 to 49" 32:9 OLED, very happy. I would rather spend $900usd on the AOC 49" than the $14xx for the G9. For me ultrawide gives me immense amount of productivity space and immersion for gaming. My 49" G9 makes the track feel small with FOV clocked in. My budget is $500-900 and I am looking for a large monitor with great color and contrast and a lot of screen real estate to 'multi-task'. No ultrawide monitor can match that. Because of the PS5 I will go with the 42" 4k. . Curvature: 1000R can be quite aggressive. Join our new [Discord](https://discord I'm interested in acquiring a ultrawide monitor, and mounting my LG 27" above that. This setup gives me a bit more than 2 pages side-by-side on the 34" and its fine for gaming too, while the 24" is just a bit taller than the ultrawide - good for 2x big chats, or 1x chat + 1x video stream, or music/etc for example (i. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; Dual Monitor Ultrawide 34’ with a 27’ Monitor. jeuhtd dsb jvxtuf cuf kryji ymcpoe znzsj vzlhxk uwij kdedf